Home » News & Articles

Posts Tagged ‘ecommerce’

Argos – Our Eye Tracking Review

Saturday, July 4th, 2009

Our team  conducted an eye tracking review of the new Argos website for the March edition of Internet Retailing Magazine. The article can be read here: Argos Eye Tracking Article

Users were asked to choose a barbeque for themselves on the Argos website and reserve it for collection. Participants confidently browsed the site’s navigation and easily found the empty search box. Once into the BBQ section, the guided navigation worked well for those users who didn’t use search. However, users that searched for barbeques off the home page were distracted by the two recommended products on the results page and ignored the search results found below the page-fold.

Eye tracking showed us that users made their shortlists primarily based on product images and product names; then used price for final selection. During the selection process some users sorted the items in price order.

It was quite apparent that users struggled to reserve products, muddling their way through to completion. Users failed to understand the difference between checking whether an item was available for collection and then having to repeat the process to actually reserve the item at their chosen store. We could see users’ eyes bouncing between the information in the trolley saying the item was available for collection and then cautiously reading the options below it for choosing collection, home delivery and signing up for an Argos credit card.

One user gave up searching for a store that had their chosen BBQ in stock as he had to exhaustively check each store with no help from the system with regard to stock levels or how far away the store was. For the users that made it through to the page where they started to confirm a reservation, they incorrectly keyed in both postcode and town name and then looked at the ‘OR’ and realised they only needed to provide one.

Users were distracted by the “*must be completed” on the final page of the reservation process, completely missing the “get a copy of your reservation details” title and then going to the text box for providing their email address, without understanding what this was for.

There are clear opportunities for improving the user journey when reserving an item for collection. We didn’t expect to see a user get so frustrated and abort an order with such a mature retail website.

SimpleUsability have been providing expert eye tracking advice for the readers of  Internet Retailing Magazine since 2009.

Mydeco – Our Eye Tracking Review

Sunday, May 31st, 2009

Our team  conducted an eye tracking review of the new Mydeco website for the April edition of Internet Retailing Magazine. The article can be read here: Mydeco Eye Tracking Article

Users who participated in our research for mydeco.com were asked to think about a room that they wanted to revamp where they normally relax. They were then asked to find a lighting item that they would like to buy from the website.

Users were immediately drawn to the large panel in the central section of the homepage. Some used this area as general navigation and missed the primary navigation at the top of the page. The effect of this was that these users missed some of the lighting products that were available to them, because this graphic was targeted to a certain type of product.

There was a mix of how users chose to navigate from the home page. There was a split between users clicking on to the main graphic, the primary navigation and the search box. When conducting a general search from the site search box, one user started typing in the search term ‘lights’. A drop down list of search suggestions appear in the search box but they were rather abstract for this particular user who chose ‘lights fantastic’ and was confused by the wording displayed to him.

Users did not play with the filters on the left hand side of the page. For lighting, users were more interested in the style of the item and were drawn to each product photograph to make their decision. Users looked at the brand names underneath the photographs and spent more time looking at the brands that they failed to recognise.

Once a user had found a product that they wanted to purchase they were re-directed to the retailer’s website. This was very slow for some users and they abandoned their journey. Users were shown a re-direction page that contained information regarding why they should shop with mydeco.com. Users stared at one bullet point that said ‘shop in your jimjams’. The actual word and the tone of the sentence was so different from what they were expecting to see that it caused users to look at it for longer than they might otherwise have done.

SimpleUsability have been providing expert eye tracking advice for the readers of  Internet Retailing Magazine since 2009.

Amazon – Our Eye Tracking Review

Thursday, March 12th, 2009

Our team  conducted an eye tracking review of the new Amazon website for the February edition of Internet Retailing Magazine. The article can be read here: Amazon Eye Tracking Article

The participants of our research showed that when using Amazon.co.uk they had to use different navigation strategies depending on what they were looking for. Amazon’s diversified product range has resulted in a more complicated structure with users having to adapt to understand the categories in order to successfully find a product. Overall the site performed well, apart from some serious frustrations with the menu structure.

Our testers were asked to find a book as a gift for a child that they knew and also to buy a replacement kettle for their home. Users were allowed to naturally carry out the tasks and eye tracking data was collected using a non-invasive eye tracking monitor.

Users were very quickly drawn to the left hand navigation or to the top search box with an even split between these two staring points. Users alternated between the two depending on the product that they were looking for.

‘Books’ is the top category on the left hand side, so users often looked to this title in the left hand navigation. Many users clicked on ‘Books’, expecting to be taken to the book section, eye tracking showed us that many failed to notice the sub-menu which had appeared to the right of this title, which required the user to click on another title called ‘Books’.

When using the left hand navigation to find a replacement kettle, some users clicked ‘Home and Garden’ then ‘Appliances’, and others clicked into ‘Kitchen and Dining’ or ‘Electronics’. Many users searched for the word ‘kettle’ from the top search box, but only a few noticed the suggested terms that appeared below the search box as they typed. The top blank search box was a visually strong device, attracting a lot of attention from users.

When looking for a suitable book, users were quickly drawn to the book titles and if a lot were displayed on a page, the user relied on the left hand navigation to filter the selection by age group. In contrast, when looking for a kettle, users scanned the page using the thumbnail photographs to make initial selections. Sorting by type of kettle was not always available to the user because it was dependent on the route they had taken to their current page.

 

SimpleUsability have been providing expert eye tracking advice for the readers of  Internet Retailing Magazine since 2009.

Marks and Spencer – Our Eye Tracking Review

Monday, January 19th, 2009

Our team  conducted an eye tracking review of the new Marks and Spencer website for the December edition of Internet Retailing Magazine. The article can be read here: Marks and Spencer Eye Tracking Article

M&S seems to have some issues with a key roll-over menu that’s hidden to some users and secondary navigation/filters that could be made more efficient. The site performed reasonably well and is commonly quoted by our research participants as a benchmark ecommerce site for ease of use.

Our user group was made up of 50:50 split of male to female with 40% having previously ordered online from Marks and Spencer. For this eye tracking analysis, users were asked to buy an outfit for a black tie event.

People who hadn’t bought from M&S used the inpage links on the home page instead of the main menu. Eye tracking confirmed that they had all looked at the navigation early on, but unfamiliar users failed to realise that most areas of the shop were accessed through the drop down menu. One user needed help to find this menu. We would recommend making the ‘Shop all Departments, Your M&S, My Account’ items look more like navigation devices, since much of the site seems dependent on users realising this.

Once into the different clothing sections of the site, the left hand navigation was heavily relied upon and took much reading. We can see that, for this task, there is scope for making it more efficient. The categorisation in the male suits section failed to include an in-page link to eveningwear, which forced one user to exhaustively scan the page and still not find what he needed, even though eveningwear was listed in the left hand navigation. Section home pages should ideally give people multiple routes into content, either in-page links and through secondary navigation.

Overall, users showed a high level of confidence in the site, using photography as the main reference for making decisions, supported by the descriptive labels and then occasionally price. Users did notice the promotional flashes for offers and were sometimes distracted by the ‘perfect’ range labelling.

SimpleUsability have been providing expert eye tracking advice for the readers of  Internet Retailing Magazine since 2009.