Behavioural Research Consultancy
Leeds 0113 350 8155       London 020 3393 0651         info@simpleusability.com

Menu
  • Home
  • What we do
    • beInsight
      • bewebsite-iconbeWebsite
      • bemobilebeMobile
      • beadvertisingbeAdvertising
      • beinstorebeInstore
    • Close
  • Our Services
      • Accessibility
      • Retail insight & In-store environments
      • Usability testing
      • Mobile usability testing
      • Usability training
      • User-centred design
      • Eye tracking services
      • Gaming UX Research
      • Neuromarketing
      • Print/pack & advertising testing
    • User-centred design
      We can support you with User Centred Design services throughout the whole project lifecycle.
      • card-sortCard sorting
      • expertExpert review
      • iaInformation Architecture, Prototyping & Wireframing
      • personaPersona development
      • taxonomyTaxonomy
    • Close
  • Why we’re different
      • Methodology
      • Our facilities
      • Participant recruitment
      • Technology
      • The team
      • Environmental Policy
      • Our clients
    • Our Technology
      Cutting edge neuro-marketing technology is our enabler.
      • eraEmotion response analysis with EEG
      • eyeEye tracking
      • gsrGSR
      • glassesMobile eye tracking
    • Close
  • Case Studies
  • BeInspired
      • Articles
      • News
      • White papers
      • Video gallery
      • Sign up to our UX Knowledge email newsletter
    • Close
  • Contact us
      • Directions
      • Get in touch
      • Join Us
      • Market Research Volunteers
    • Close

Archive for the ‘Usability Reviews’ Category

Leeds Dock Water Taxis – how a change of UX could lead to more passengers

Water taxi on the canal, motoring towards Leeds Dock

Jan 24

by Joe Pitts

In: Articles, Usability Reviews, UX Design

Comments Off on Leeds Dock Water Taxis – how a change of UX could lead to more passengers

For the last six months, I have walked into the centre of Leeds to work every day. It’s 1.8 miles each way and I’m secretly very smug about my average daily step count because of it. But sometimes, I don’t want to walk all that way. Sometimes, I would like to be able to take a comfy seat and travel in to the city centre a bit differently. As it happens, Leeds offers a form of public transport that runs down the exact same route that I walk, which would get me to work 10 minutes quicker, and it’s free. Leeds Dock Water Taxis have been offering a free service from Leeds Dock to Granary Wharf near Leeds Train Station for a few years now and I have often used it on weekends.

a map showing the walking route along the river and the leeds water taxi stops

My walking route to SimpleUsability and the Leeds water taxi stops

> Read more

Monzo – the bank of the future – a review

Sep 21

by Rebecca Laycock

In: Articles, Usability Reviews, UX Design

1 comment

It seems almost everyone is on the Monzo hype at the moment, even Martin Lewis has jumped on the band wagon. So when we heard Monzo were coming to town last week, we were keen to go along and find out more about what they are getting up to! We learnt how they are shaking up the user experience of banking, guided by their 3 pillars of UX, innovative tech and customer service. They went on to explain that they are no longer focussing on their early adapters and trying to reach out to the wider community.
> Read more

How to conduct a user journey walkthrough using personas

Aug 23

by Katharine Johnson

In: Articles, Research Thoughts, Usability Reviews

Comments Off on How to conduct a user journey walkthrough using personas

A User Journey Walkthrough is a great way to put yourself in your users shoes, and using a persona is the ideal way to do this. A persona allows you to focus on your users, therefore keeping their goals and needs at the forefront of the Walkthrough. A persona is based on findings from user research, and can also combine analytics and other customer information. As the purpose of this article is to show you how to use the User Journey Walkthrough methodology, here is one I created earlier:

Fig 1: Savvy Sally persona.

> Read more

Black Friday promotions

Dec 02

by Lucy Buykx

In: Articles, Research Thoughts, Usability Reviews

Comments Off on Black Friday promotions

In 2015, UK shoppers spent more than £3.3 billion over Black Friday weekend, a rise of 31% on the previous year and many big name websites including Tesco, Argos and John Lewis couldn’t cope with the online traffic. With the growth of online shopping and more retailers taking part in this year’s Black Friday promotions, analysts were predicting a further increase of 25% in 2017 but early figures suggest this didn’t materialise.

While the marketeers continue to review the economic factors, we reviewed the way some clothing websites promoted their Black Friday deals. From our experience of user behaviour when shopping online, we noticed a few things they could have done to improve engagement and potentially increase sales.
> Read more

Online Experience Index – Appliance Retailers

Jun 17

by Judith

In: Articles, ECommerce, News, Research Thoughts, Usability, Usability Reviews

Comments Off on Online Experience Index – Appliance Retailers

JUNE 2014 – Appliance ecommerce sites

Introduction

With the Online Experience Index, we aim to identify which ecommerce sites are leading the way in providing a powerful customer experience.

In March we reviewed fashion e-commerce sites and found variation in the levels of usability between the sites, as well as identifying some recurring trends and issues.

Following on from March’s review of clothing retail websites, this report reviews the websites of four retailers of appliances: Appliances Online, Appliances Direct, Currys and Argos. Reviews were performed in the week of 19th May 2014.

In addition to the main Index, we have also included scores for accessibility, mobile and persuasion, emotion and trust (PET) techniques, to explore a broader scope of the online experience.

Headline findings

As expected in this mature, competitive sector, sites featured relevant and engaging content with detailed product information.

  • There is room for improvement in the checkout, where forms need to improve.
  • One retailer failed to have a mobile friendly site, and another had a site that annoyingly jumped between mobile and desktop layouts.
  • Filters were generally well-implemented, featuring a comprehensive range of criteria.
  • Shipping costs were communicated well on all sites, within the main user journey.
  • All retailers used a range of PET techniques without overwhelming the customer.

> Read more

Online Experience Index – Fashion

Mar 25

by Guy Redwood

In: Articles, News, Usability Reviews

Comments Off on Online Experience Index – Fashion

March 2014 – Fashion ecommerce sites

Introduction

Understanding, measuring and improving the customer experience is a pretty fundamental part of everything we do at SimpleUsability.

Whether we’re working on competitor/comparator testing at the start of a project, multi-platform testing across a number of devices, or an expert review, our research and the resulting recommendations help our clients to improve their customer experience and benefit from the associated commercial gains around improved conversion or internal cost savings.

Whilst usability or accessibility scales are common place, our intention with the Online Experience Index is to apply 30+ years of combined user experience knowledge to benchmark the overall user experience within specific ecommerce verticals and identify who is leading the way in delivering a powerful customer experience.

We report here a review of clothing retail websites Marks & Spencer, Hobbs, Karen Millen, French Connection, Boden, Oasis and Fat Face. Reviews were performed in the week of 10 March 2014.

Headline findings

  • Most sites communicated their brand and purpose of website well
  • The main navigation was clear and descriptive on most sites
  • Few provided support for search or clearly indicated the order of search results
  • Product pages were comprehensive and pricing clearly indicated
  • Most sites supported customers through the checkout process well, however, few allowed users to make a purchase without setting up an account

Methodology

In order to score each site’s overall experience rating, a panel of expert UX professionals assessed the site in the context of a core user journey of browsing and purchasing an item.

The examiners rated the site on over 120 key touchpoints, which were tailored to provide a thorough, representative picture of the user experience. These were systematically weighted to denote the relative importance of each individual aspect of the site, and were designed to span multiple facets of the user journey, including homepage, navigation, search and product pages, as well as the flow and usability of the checkout process. From this, an individual rating was able to be drawn up for each facet, based on the overall usability.

In order to emulate a naturalistic user experience, examiners conducted the review whilst undertaking the task of browsing for and selecting items for an outfit, and proceeded to purchase these items as a new customer to that online brand.

The Index, by facet

Considering each facet of the user journey in turn, we found a variation of design usability across the websites that is highlighted through their individual ratings. The following diagrams illustrate the best and worst individual ratings by facet of the user journey.

Homepage

The homepage announces the brand identity and the purpose of the website. Most of the sites in this review did this well, with the identity in the header and purpose of the website clearly shown above the fold. One site, French Connection, did something different. Their identity is dropped to the footer where it might be missed by users familiar with finding the logo and identity in the header.

Navigation

In general navigation was done well in these sites, using a top level menu in the header with drop downs for the sub categories. The labelling was clear and descriptive with few examples of jargon. All sites honoured the back-button and most made good use of breadcrumbs to help locate users and provide additional navigational routes.

Sites should, however, take care that navigation is clear and distinctive from other elements of the site. For example, the header on Hobbs crowds the main navigation menu with the search, basket and sign in elements that may overwhelm and confuse users. One site, Fat Face, used an innovative form of navigation that may confuse users new to the site.

Search

All site provided a search function for users and on most sites this was easy to find in or close to the header. Few sites, however, offered search prompts to help users type in search terms and few offered suggestions for spelling mistakes or zero results sets.

In general search results were displayed in a similar layout to product listings, enabling users to interact with them in a familiar way. However, it was not always clear what order results were displayed in or how many results were available. French Connection, for example, displays a count of results much higher than the number of items displayed and obscures the function to sort the results under the Filter link so the casual user may be very confused.

Filters

Most sites provided well organised filters that enabled users to narrow their results within several categories. For some sites, for example Karen Millen and French Connection, features within the filters were displayed with very low contrast that may cause problems for users with visual impairments.

checkout-flow

In general the sites broke down the process into several stages and clearly indicated the stages up front. Most also allowed users to move backwards and forwards in the stages to enable them to make changes. Few sites allowed users to make a purchase as a guest, so unlike buying from a high street store, the user was forced to set up an account with the site to make a purchase.

The Index visualisations

The following diagrams draw together the individual ratings to visualise, by retailer, the user experience across all facets of the user journey.

Oasis

Total index score: 80%

Error messaging does not appear until user clicks in field. It is not clear that an error has been made. However, when shown, the messaging is clear and direct.

Karen Millen

Total index score: 78%

The filter options may be difficult for visually impaired users to see due to poor contrast. Poor colour contrast in the filter also means that selected filter options are not very visible.

FCUK

Total index score: 74%

Number of search results found does not match the number of products that are returned.

Hobbs

Total index score: 81%

Changing delivery country means you lose all the items in your basket. This appears when you choose your location the first time you visit but it is not helpful.

Fat Face

Total index score: 72%

The main navigation looks like a filter, so when an option is clicked, the user is taken away from the search results and into the main navigation.

Boden

Total index score: 83%

‘Use express checkout’ call to action is hidden compared to the other options and clicking on this cleared the basket.

Marks & Spencer

Total index score: 86%

The information help text had not been completed for the ‘Security number’ field and read ‘DummyWhatsThis’.

The ‘Phone number’ field highlights a mandatory field but the customer is allowed to progress onto the postcode field. After interacting with the postcode field, the mandatory field highlight disappears and gives no indication why the ‘Continue’ call to action is not available.

Watch out for our next online experience index which will have some new features including; persuasion centred design and scores based on the mobile experience.

We’ll be adapting our index to add sector specific questions and omit areas of the index that are not as relevant depending on the subject that we are reviewing.

Our plan is to target particular categories and topics moving forward. We’ll be looking at how well department stores are bringing multiple department shopping experience to end customers, and looking at specific categories such as shoes and younger fashion.

Thomson – Our Eye Tracking Review

Sep 05

by Guy Redwood

In: Usability Reviews

Comments Off on Thomson – Our Eye Tracking Review

Our team conducted an eye tracking review of the Thomson website for the September edition of Internet Retailing Magazine. The full article can be read here: Thomson Website Eye Tracking Article.

We invited users to participate in booking a holiday on the Thomson website. They were asked to have a destination and booking party in mind and add on any specific requirements they would need. Eye tracking technology was used to observe how the users would navigate through the site during the holiday booking process.

Once on the Thomson homepage one user was immediately attracted by the ‘Late deals’ option. This took them to a landing page showing over 33,000 holiday deals which the user found overwhelming. The results were already arranged in lowest price order but this was not obvious to the user. Clicking on the column heading rearranged the date order of the results, but again we saw the user looking around the page because she had failed to realise that anything hand changed due to the listings looking so similar.
> Read more

Mr Porter – Our Eye Tracking Review

Jul 04

by Guy Redwood

In: Usability Reviews

Comments Off on Mr Porter – Our Eye Tracking Review

Our team conducted an eye tracking review of the Mr Porter website for the July edition of Internet Retailing Magazine. The full article can be read here: Mr Porter Website Eye Tracking Article.

We invited users to participate in sessions to explore the Mr Porter website. Users were either asked to purchase a replacement item of clothing or to buy a gift for someone. By using eye tracking, we were able to observe users’ natural behaviour as they interacted with the website.

Upon entering the website, users were drawn to the large promotion image that took up three quarters of the screen. However, due to the home page offering editorials over products, the users immediately resorted to using the main navigation to either select the department they were after, or the ‘What’s new’ if they were just browsing.

Users responded favourably to the layout of the products when browsing. After accessing a department landing page, they were drawn to the large images and were content to scroll down a long list of results.
> Read more

Waitrose – Our Eye Tracking Review

May 23

by Guy Redwood

In: Usability Reviews

Comments Off on Waitrose – Our Eye Tracking Review

Our team conducted an eye tracking review of Waitrose for the May edition of Internet Retailing Magazine. The full article can be read here: Waitrose Website Eye Tracking Article.

We invited users to participate in sessions to explore the new Waitrose.com website. These were people who shopped online and had different levels of experience regarding using grocery websites. By using eye tracking technology we were able to observe users shopping naturally for basic items that they would regularly need.

Users struggled to find the most basic of items. The simplified initial drop down menu for ‘Groceries’ was limited.In order to find bread, users had to learn to click on ‘Cupboard’>’Food’>’Bakery’ and then choose an additional category such as ‘Sliced bread’.

This was felt to be a long route to individual items. It was not obvious how these sections were ordered within the navigation area displayed at the top of the page,with some users commenting that they expected to see the most common sections first.
> Read more

B&Q diy.com – Our Eye Tracking Review

Mar 02

by Guy Redwood

In: Usability Reviews

Comments Off on B&Q diy.com – Our Eye Tracking Review

Our team conducted an eye tracking review of DIY.com for the March edition of Internet Retailing Magazine. The full article can be read here: B&Q Website Eye Tracking Article.

Participants were taken to the B&Q home page and asked to find products that they could buy from B&Q that would reduce heating bills. Most users scanned over the various menus at the top of the page and then hovered over the black buttons and worked their way through the mega-dropdowns. Users were initially frustrated with the complexity of the menus and the way they changed if their mouse clipped a corner when going to click.Participants were unable to predict where a product would be within the menus as the structure seemed random to them.

Where would you expect to find ‘loft insulation’? Later on, some users were further annoyed with the huge mega-dropdown obscuring page content, if they moved their mouse to the top.
> Read more

123›»

Knowledge Share Newsletter

newsletter banner Sign up to our regular UX knowledge email newsletter.

Recent articles

User testing & Agile – Enemies or Friends? Our Leeds Digital Festival event co-hosted with Bolser

Often thought to be a contentious relationship, Bolser and SimpleUsability came together for a presentation

> Read More
Do It by the Book: How to Use Storytelling in UX Research

When was the last time you bought something online? Did it go as expected? How

> Read More
User experience research vs. market research for product design and development – a blurring line?

You say ‘to-may-to’, I say ‘to-mah-to’ You often hear the terms ‘user research’ and ‘market

> Read More
How to use storyboards effectively in UX projects

‘A picture tells a thousand words’ This is certainly the case when it comes to

> Read More
Homepage fundamentals: Handy tips to entice your users

A homepage is something that any internet user will be familiar with. Whether it be

> Read More

Categories

  • Articles (74)
  • Awards (2)
  • Conversion Rate Optimisation (4)
  • ECommerce (10)
  • Emotion Response Analysis (5)
  • Eye Tracking (8)
  • Gaming (2)
  • News (62)
  • Research Thoughts (28)
  • SimpleUsability events (5)
  • Usability (31)
  • Usability Reviews (22)
  • UX Design (19)

Archive

  • April 2018 (2)
  • March 2018 (2)
  • February 2018 (2)
  • January 2018 (4)
  • December 2017 (1)
  • November 2017 (2)
  • October 2017 (2)
  • September 2017 (2)
  • August 2017 (2)
  • July 2017 (1)
  • June 2017 (3)
  • May 2017 (2)
  • April 2017 (3)
  • March 2017 (2)
  • February 2017 (2)
  • January 2017 (2)
  • December 2016 (1)
  • November 2016 (1)
  • October 2016 (3)
  • September 2016 (4)
  • August 2016 (4)
  • July 2016 (1)
  • May 2016 (1)
  • March 2016 (1)
  • October 2015 (1)
  • September 2015 (1)
  • July 2015 (1)
  • June 2015 (1)
  • May 2015 (1)
  • March 2015 (2)
  • January 2015 (2)
  • November 2014 (4)
  • July 2014 (1)
  • June 2014 (2)
  • May 2014 (2)
  • April 2014 (1)
  • March 2014 (1)
  • February 2014 (2)
  • December 2013 (1)
  • July 2013 (1)
  • May 2013 (1)
  • April 2013 (1)
  • January 2013 (1)
  • November 2012 (3)
  • September 2012 (1)
  • June 2012 (2)
  • May 2012 (1)
  • March 2012 (1)
  • February 2012 (1)
  • January 2012 (2)
  • December 2011 (3)
  • November 2011 (2)
  • October 2011 (1)
  • September 2011 (1)
  • July 2011 (1)
  • May 2011 (2)
  • March 2011 (2)
  • February 2011 (2)
  • January 2011 (4)
  • December 2010 (7)
  • November 2010 (5)
  • October 2010 (5)
  • July 2010 (1)
  • June 2010 (1)
  • May 2010 (4)
  • March 2010 (1)
  • January 2010 (1)
  • September 2009 (1)
  • July 2009 (1)
  • May 2009 (1)
  • March 2009 (1)
  • February 2009 (1)
  • January 2009 (1)
  • March 2008 (1)
  • February 2007 (1)
  • January 2007 (2)
  • November 2006 (1)

Research tags

accessibility Advertising Effectiveness ApplePay argos Big Brother christmas contactless payment Conversion Rate Optimisation CRO Eco ecommerce eeg emotion response analysis Eye Tracking eye tracking glasses gaming insight Internet Retailing iPhone Leeds Market Research Mobile multichannel neuromarketing neuroscience NUX Oculus Rift Online Experience Index outsource Prototyping psychology recruitment research buyer social media twitter twitter brand page usability usability day usability methodology usability testing Usability test of prototypes venturefest Virtual Reality Waitrose X Factor

SimpleUsability

  • Usability Home
  • What we do
  • Our services
  • Why we're different
  • beInspired
  • Contact Us

Sign up for our Knowledge Share Newsletter

We aim to email you once every two weeks with curated content on UX, behavioural research and more.

Our Services

  • Accessibility
  • Retail insight
  • Usability Testing
  • Mobile Usability Testing
  • Usability Training
  • Eye Tracking Services
  • Neuromarketing
  • Games testing
  • Print & Pack Testing
  • Viewing Facilities in Leeds

Latest news

User testing & Agile – Enemies or Friends? Our Leeds Digital Festival event co-hosted with Bolser

24 April 2018

Do It by the Book: How to Use Storytelling in UX Research

4 April 2018

User experience research vs. market research for product design and development – a blurring line?

22 March 2018

How to use storyboards effectively in UX projects

8 March 2018

Homepage fundamentals: Handy tips to entice your users

22 February 2018

Get in touch

  • SimpleUsability Ltd, Marshall Mills, Marshall Street, Leeds, West Yorkshire LS11 9YJ

    Leeds Tel: 01133 508 155
    Int Leeds Tel: +441133508155

  • SimpleUsability Ltd,
    27/31 Clerkenwell Close,
    London, EC1R 0AT

    London Tel: 020 3393 0651
    Int London Tel: +442033930651

  • Email: info@SimpleUsability.com

Copyright Behavioural Research Consultancy 2018

facebook rss twitter youtube