Behavioural Research Consultancy
Leeds 0113 350 8155       London 020 3393 0651         info@simpleusability.com

Menu
  • Home
  • What we do
    • beInsight
      • bewebsite-iconbeWebsite
      • bemobilebeMobile
      • beadvertisingbeAdvertising
      • beinstorebeInstore
    • Close
  • Our Services
      • Accessibility
      • Retail insight & In-store environments
      • Usability testing
      • Mobile usability testing
      • Usability training
      • User-centred design
      • Eye tracking services
      • Gaming UX Research
      • Neuromarketing
      • Print/pack & advertising testing
    • User-centred design
      We can support you with User Centred Design services throughout the whole project lifecycle.
      • card-sortCard sorting
      • expertExpert review
      • iaInformation Architecture, Prototyping & Wireframing
      • personaPersona development
      • taxonomyTaxonomy
    • Close
  • Why we’re different
      • Methodology
      • Our facilities
      • Participant recruitment
      • Technology
      • The team
      • Environmental Policy
      • Our clients
    • Our Technology
      Cutting edge neuro-marketing technology is our enabler.
      • eraEmotion response analysis with EEG
      • eyeEye tracking
      • gsrGSR
      • glassesMobile eye tracking
    • Close
  • Case Studies
  • BeInspired
      • Articles
      • News
      • White papers
      • Video gallery
      • Sign up to our UX Knowledge email newsletter
    • Close
  • Contact us
      • Directions
      • Get in touch
      • Join Us
      • Market Research Volunteers
    • Close

User experience research vs. market research for product design and development – a blurring line?

Mar 22

by Jake Kitching

In: Articles, Research Thoughts

Comments Off on User experience research vs. market research for product design and development – a blurring line?

You say ‘to-may-to’, I say ‘to-mah-to’

You often hear the terms ‘user research’ and ‘market research’ used interchangeably within companies, product teams often debate the differences between the disciplines. They both contain the word research and their main aim is to understand the ‘user’ or the ‘consumer’ – so, what’s the difference?

At best, people try to distinguish them by the data they work with, “user researchers are the qualitative guys and market researchers are the quantitative guys.” However, this stereotype is also incorrect and can be damaging. As any valuable UX research agency will use a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, so will a market research agency.

This article sets out to explore the blurring line between the two disciplines, their shared similarities, their differences, and ultimately understand if there is a need for a hard classification. All that matters is the user, right?

Where does the uncertainty stem from?

Besides the fact both disciplines are research-based, they share a vast amount of additional parallels so people could be forgiven for mistaking the two.

They share:

  • Methodologies (ethnography, interviews, surveys, co-creation etc.)
  • A wide array of stakeholders (Product owners/managers, marketing teams, insight teams, board members)
  • A goal of understating the user or the consumer
  • Validating concepts and ideas before releasing to the mass market
  • Distilling evidence to produce insight that limits the impact to the user/consumer and therefore the wider business
  • Most importantly, they are both, more often than not, involved too late in the design process

So, what is the difference?

In summary, market research traditionally aims to improve a business’s bottom by gathering self-reported data. This data allows teams to understand the ‘who’ and the ‘what’ of the consumer landscape, informing decision making around branding, sales, and marketing. Whereas UX research sets out to improve a business’s bottom line through understanding user needs. More often than not, this is achieved by observing users engage naturally with a given product, allowing informed, and user-centric decision making around the user experience.

What does this mean for the research approach?

Market Research UX Research
End goal to improve bottom line, by understanding what people will buy, and who will buy it End goal to improve bottom line, by improving the user experience
Traditionally relies on self-reporting (surveys, focus groups)

  • A focus on consumers attitudes, and perceptions of a brand, or product
Grounded in observing natural human behaviour, rather than claimed behaviour

  • A focus on users first-hand (observed) experience of a product

 

Wide and top-level

  • A statistical snapshot of what is trending, or what the market is doing, here and now
  • Provides a read on consumers claimed usage and attitudes
Narrow and deep

  • Rich nuances in behaviours between a small group of representative people (how people use an app over what app they use)
  • Provides the ‘why’ to attitudinal data

 

Gathers consumer feedback to drive business decisions based around branding, sales and marketing
Aids in the ‘how to’ of marketing the product
Gathers user feedback to drive product decisions based around features, journeys and ultimately the experience of using the product
Aids in the ‘how to’ of designing or tweaking a product
Helps to validate the mass market appeal of a concept design Helps to validate the usability of a concept design

Although the traditional market research domain is deeply rooted in improving the bottom line by understanding ‘who will buy what’, the industry has seen a shift towards understanding the consumer; more importantly, understanding them as ‘people’, and their behaviours to help improve whatever the subject matter is (i.e. product design, conversion, marketing). Much like the ‘user-centred’ shift in the design world. And, as we know from the UX design industry, however usable these products are, they still need to be desirable and profitable.

Despite this shift towards a more ethnographic style within market research the latest ESOMAR Global Report (2017) shows that only 15% of worldwide spend on Market Research is qualitative. In comparison, 80% of UX research projects consist of qualitative usability testing (UXPA salary survey, 2016).

The two disciplines co-exist on a moving scale, often overlapping, rather than existing as two polarising variables. Therefore choosing a method should ultimately be driven by the research needs, over a desired discipline as many of the research methods are employed by both market and UX research.

Image: Smashing Magazine – https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2018/01/comprehensive-guide-ux-research/

What does this mean for the outcome of the research?

Given the fact UX research favours a more behavioural, qualitative approach, the key differentiator is often the objective or proactive insights gained by observing users, and uncovering ‘unknown, unknowns’. The richest insights are observed rather than spoken, and provide detail users can’t often articulate, or don’t even know they are thinking.

When taking a more attitudinal approach, we are often left with unclear or contradicting insight that can lead us down the wrong path or into a sense of false security. “I’ve done the research”, is not always good enough if the wrong questions or methodology have been used. Attitudinal research often relies on wider context and trends, where behavioural research eliminates the need for this. Having sight of the wider picture and total ecosystem is often incredibly valuable, but again, it is knowing when which is needed.

Wrapping up

The danger lies in confusing the objectives of the research and using either disciple as a ‘catch all’, resulting in diluted insight. The need to classify the preferred discipline should come secondary to understanding the research objectives, and choosing the right methodology to gain the evidence needed to answer the brief.

The product lifecycle can be improved by understanding when the correct method is needed, rather than the correct discipline. Teams need to work collaboratively to ensure that not only is the product built right, but the right product is built.

Given the shared similarities and cross-over in methodologies, it is more than possible that insights gathered will have significant overlap and help teams from multiple angles. This highlights the importance of teams not working in silos or, even worse, in opposition.

Finally, and most importantly, research of any kind (if designed and executed correctly) gives a voice to the user/customer and ensures their needs are ingrained into the product and not designed on a hunch.

Knowledge Share Newsletter

newsletter banner Sign up to our regular UX knowledge email newsletter.

Recent articles

Do It by the Book: How to Use Storytelling in UX Research

When was the last time you bought something online? Did it go as expected? How

> Read More
User experience research vs. market research for product design and development – a blurring line?

You say ‘to-may-to’, I say ‘to-mah-to’ You often hear the terms ‘user research’ and ‘market

> Read More
How to use storyboards effectively in UX projects

‘A picture tells a thousand words’ This is certainly the case when it comes to

> Read More
Homepage fundamentals: Handy tips to entice your users

A homepage is something that any internet user will be familiar with. Whether it be

> Read More
Don’t Lose the Plot: How to Use Storytelling in UX Design

What’s your favourite book, film or tv show? Do you know why you like it

> Read More

Categories

  • Articles (73)
  • Awards (2)
  • Conversion Rate Optimisation (4)
  • ECommerce (10)
  • Emotion Response Analysis (5)
  • Eye Tracking (8)
  • Gaming (2)
  • News (62)
  • Research Thoughts (27)
  • SimpleUsability events (4)
  • Usability (31)
  • Usability Reviews (22)
  • UX Design (19)

Archive

  • April 2018 (1)
  • March 2018 (2)
  • February 2018 (2)
  • January 2018 (4)
  • December 2017 (1)
  • November 2017 (2)
  • October 2017 (2)
  • September 2017 (2)
  • August 2017 (2)
  • July 2017 (1)
  • June 2017 (3)
  • May 2017 (2)
  • April 2017 (3)
  • March 2017 (2)
  • February 2017 (2)
  • January 2017 (2)
  • December 2016 (1)
  • November 2016 (1)
  • October 2016 (3)
  • September 2016 (4)
  • August 2016 (4)
  • July 2016 (1)
  • May 2016 (1)
  • March 2016 (1)
  • October 2015 (1)
  • September 2015 (1)
  • July 2015 (1)
  • June 2015 (1)
  • May 2015 (1)
  • March 2015 (2)
  • January 2015 (2)
  • November 2014 (4)
  • July 2014 (1)
  • June 2014 (2)
  • May 2014 (2)
  • April 2014 (1)
  • March 2014 (1)
  • February 2014 (2)
  • December 2013 (1)
  • July 2013 (1)
  • May 2013 (1)
  • April 2013 (1)
  • January 2013 (1)
  • November 2012 (3)
  • September 2012 (1)
  • June 2012 (2)
  • May 2012 (1)
  • March 2012 (1)
  • February 2012 (1)
  • January 2012 (2)
  • December 2011 (3)
  • November 2011 (2)
  • October 2011 (1)
  • September 2011 (1)
  • July 2011 (1)
  • May 2011 (2)
  • March 2011 (2)
  • February 2011 (2)
  • January 2011 (4)
  • December 2010 (7)
  • November 2010 (5)
  • October 2010 (5)
  • July 2010 (1)
  • June 2010 (1)
  • May 2010 (4)
  • March 2010 (1)
  • January 2010 (1)
  • September 2009 (1)
  • July 2009 (1)
  • May 2009 (1)
  • March 2009 (1)
  • February 2009 (1)
  • January 2009 (1)
  • March 2008 (1)
  • February 2007 (1)
  • January 2007 (2)
  • November 2006 (1)

Research tags

accessibility Advertising Effectiveness ApplePay argos Big Brother christmas contactless payment Conversion Rate Optimisation CRO Eco ecommerce eeg emotion response analysis Eye Tracking eye tracking glasses gaming insight Internet Retailing iPhone Leeds Market Research Mobile multichannel neuromarketing neuroscience NUX Oculus Rift Online Experience Index outsource Prototyping psychology recruitment research buyer social media twitter twitter brand page usability usability day usability methodology usability testing Usability test of prototypes venturefest Virtual Reality Waitrose X Factor

SimpleUsability

  • Usability Home
  • What we do
  • Our services
  • Why we're different
  • beInspired
  • Contact Us

Sign up for our Knowledge Share Newsletter

We aim to email you once every two weeks with curated content on UX, behavioural research and more.

Our Services

  • Accessibility
  • Retail insight
  • Usability Testing
  • Mobile Usability Testing
  • Usability Training
  • Eye Tracking Services
  • Neuromarketing
  • Games testing
  • Print & Pack Testing
  • Viewing Facilities in Leeds

Latest news

Do It by the Book: How to Use Storytelling in UX Research

4 April 2018

User experience research vs. market research for product design and development – a blurring line?

22 March 2018

How to use storyboards effectively in UX projects

8 March 2018

Homepage fundamentals: Handy tips to entice your users

22 February 2018

Don’t Lose the Plot: How to Use Storytelling in UX Design

7 February 2018

Get in touch

  • SimpleUsability Ltd, Marshall Mills, Marshall Street, Leeds, West Yorkshire LS11 9YJ

    Leeds Tel: 01133 508 155
    Int Leeds Tel: +441133508155

  • SimpleUsability Ltd,
    27/31 Clerkenwell Close,
    London, EC1R 0AT

    London Tel: 020 3393 0651
    Int London Tel: +442033930651

  • Email: info@SimpleUsability.com

Copyright Behavioural Research Consultancy 2018

facebook rss twitter youtube